<?php
/**
 * <https://y.st./>
 * Copyright © 2018 Alex Yst <mailto:copyright@y.st>
 * 
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
 * (at your option) any later version.
 * 
 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
 * GNU General Public License for more details.
 * 
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 * along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org./licenses/>.
**/

$xhtml = array(
	'<{title}>' => 'Behind again',
	'takedown' => '2017-11-01',
	'<{body}>' => <<<END
<img src="/img/CC_BY-SA_4.0/y.st./weblog/2018/05/29.jpg" alt="A local park" class="framed-centred-image" width="649" height="480"/>
<section id="drudgery">
	<h2>Drudgery</h2>
	<p>
		I&apos;d planned to use today as a major study day, bus as usual, that didn&apos;t happen at all.
		This school wears me out emotionally, and I think the physical exertion of my Tuesday errands pushes me over the top and prevents me from wanting anything to do with coursework.
	</p>
	<p>
		My discussion posts for the day:
	</p>
	<blockquote>
		<p>
			Yeah, very true.
			The nodes might not send their FIN packets even close to at the same time.
			To be a &quot;simultaneous&quot;, they just need to receive a FIN between the sending of their own FIN and the receipt of the acknowledgement of their own FIN.
			Due to this, it could look like a simultaneous close to one side of the connection, but not to the other, depending on the order of packets sent and received on either end of the connection.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote>
		<p>
			I like how you staggered the arrows in your diagram, showing that node A and node B didn&apos;t actually send the packets simultaneously.
			However, you state that A is in the active close process while B is the passive close process.
			This can&apos;t be true, as A and B are taking the same steps, and are therefore on the same path.
			Besides, the passive close state doesn&apos;t even have a TIMEWAIT stage, while both nodes have to go through the TIMEWAIT stage in a simultaneous close.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
</section>
END
);
